PILOT
STUDIES
Summary from:
"Contrast sensitivity, drivers' visibility, and vision standards."
(In references, see: Ginsburg AP. Contrast sensitivity, drivers'
visibility, and vision standards.)
Ground-To- Air
Field Conditions Study Significant research on the predictive capabilities
of contrast sensitivity with regard to actual performance has been accomplished
with pilots. One such study was done in 1983 under field conditions
(in references, see: Ginsburg AP, et al.
Contrast sensitivity predicts target detection field performance of
pilots). The acuity and contrast sensitivity of eighty-four pilots
was tested in this study. Aircraft detection testing using a T-39 was
performed the day after vision evaluation. Aircraft altitude, speed,
and azimuth were maintained at constant values in order to reduce differences
between trials. This ground-to-air target detection task was completed
under diverse visibility conditions, including fog and dusk, ranging
from 0.5 to more than 15 mi. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity
measurements were taken and correlated to the pilot's detection range
in 10 completed field trials.

The
pilots sat side by side in chairs perpendicular to the flight path of
the aircraft. They were visually isolated from each other by partitions
placed between each chair; the pilots wore ear protectors to block out
distracting noise.
There was a significant
positive correlation between the pilot's detection range and contrast
sensitivity in 8 of the 10 field trials of this study. Of the 10 trials
performed, 3 showed correlation for acuity, 2 positive and 1 negative.
Because of bad weather that curtailed data gathering, one of the trials
had no correlation with either contrast sensitivity or acuity. The average
differences for all conditions in detection range and time between the
most and least sensitive pilots were 2.2 miles and 56 sec.
These individual
differences are significant factors, not only to the ability of pilots
to fly an aircraft but also to drivers of automobiles, trucks, and heavy
equipment, and others who perform visually oriented tasks. Here again,
contrast sensitivity correlated with these large differences in detection
range, not acuity.
Similar results
were seen in the trial with meteorological visibility of 15 miles. The
differences in detectability between the most and least sensitive pilots
were 6.5 miles and 2.8 min. In this instance, the corresponding Snellen
results ranged from 20/10 to 20/20, but their contrast sensitivity differed
by a factor of 3.4. Data from another trial included a visibility factor
of 1 to 2 miles, and a 0.42 miles (9.2 sec) difference in detection
range between the two pilots. The corresponding Snellen acuity ranging
from 20/13 to 20/20 and a factor of 3.7 difference between the two pilots'
contrast sensitivity. (In references,
see: Ginsburg AP, et al. Contrast sensitivity predicts target detection
field performance of pilots. Also see Ginsburg AP. Contrast sensitivity,
drivers' visibility, and vision standards).
Summary from:
Contrast sensitivity, drivers' visibility, and vision standards.
(In references, see: Ginsburg AP. Contrast sensitivity, drivers'
visibility, and vision standards.)
Air-To-Ground
Target Detection Study In another study using Air Force instructor
pilots, a set of simulated landings focusing on air-to-ground target
detection was performed at Williams AFB (in references,
see: Ginsburg AP, et al. Contrast sensitivity predicts pilots' performance
in aircraft simulators.) . On spotting a MIG aircraft at the end
of the runway, eleven Air Force instructor pilots each pressed a button.
Comparisons were made of the detection range and visual ability, including
contrast sensitivity and standard visual acuity measures. Contrast sensitivity
was found to be the most accurate predictor of the pilots' detection
range in these trials as well. The correlation between target detection
and contrast sensitivity of the pilots was 0.83; for visual acuity the
correlation was -0.31. (In references,
see: Ginsburg AP, et al. Contrast sensitivity predicts pilots' performance
in aircraft simulators. Also see Ginsburg AP. Contrast sensitivity,
drivers' visibility, and vision standards)