CONTRAST
SENSITIVITY & AGING
Contrast Sensitivity
& Aging 1 | 2 |
Summary from:
"Retrospective Evaluation of Alternative Vision Screening Criteria
for Older and Younger Drivers." (In
references, see: Decina LE, et al. Retrospective
Evaluation of Alternative Vision Screening Criteria for Older and Younger
Drivers.)
Visual examinations
of 12,400 drivers in Pennsylvania were conducted at the time of their
license renewal. Static binocular tests of visual acuity, horizontal
visual field, and contrast sensitivity at varying spatial frequencies
were given to license renewal operators who were unaware that their
vision would be tested when they arrived at the facility where license
photographs are processed. Examination results were correlated with
involvement in selected crash categories over a 3.67 year period, taking
self-reported mileage into account. Neither visual acuity nor horizontal
visual field measures in isolation were significantly related to crash
involvement. The combination of visual acuity, horizontal visual fields,
and broad contrast sensitivity criteria was significantly related to
increasing crash involvement for drivers aged 66-75 and 76 and over.
The implications of including contrast sensitivity measures in driver
vision screening protocols are considered.
Contrast sensitivity
measurements show that the ability to see targets of low spatial frequency
is statistically independent of the ability to see high spatial frequency
targets, such as those presented in routine static visual acuity testing.
It has been found that contrast sensitivity changes systematically with
age and does so in ways not predictable from changes observed in the
commonly administered tests of static visual acuity. Specifically, contrast
sensitivity performance in the high and middle spatial frequency range
is found to decline with age, especially over age 40 (Schieber 1988).
Research from the
early 1980s (Ginsburg et al. 1982; Ginsburg, Esterly, and Evans 1983),
examined the relationship of contrast sensitivity function with the
detection of targets by pilots. They found that high spatial frequency
contrast sensitivity predicted high levels of real-world visual detection
performance and that low spatial frequency sensitivity was useful in
predicting detection performance under suboptimal viewing conditions,
such as adverse weather conditions. Evans and Ginsburg (1985) examined
the relationship between contrast sensitivity and the ability to discriminate
highway traffic signs. They found that age-related decreases in the
ability to discriminate between highway signs were predicted by diminished
contrast sensitivity levels.
Contrast
Sensitivity & Aging 1 | 2 |